The 15 dumbest names for Web 2.0 startups

Written on October 13, 2008 – 5:01 pm
Robin Wauters, Next web enthusiast & Plugg organizer

I’m someone who frantically scours the web for interesting new online trends, concepts, startups and projects at any given time of any day. It’s something I simply can’t turn off, I just have a passion for finding new stuff and find out if it resonates with me from a user and business perspective. That also means I come across a mountain of poorly executed websites and applications, or startups that have business models that you just know will never bring in a dime of revenue.

But what strikes me most is the awful names that are given to services and applications. I realize naming is a difficult thing, and finding the domain name to match the name or description you have in mind is virtually impossible these days. I also realize names don’t necessarily have to be descriptive enough to sum up what you do in one or two words, as long as it’s memorable and distinctive enough.

How many people would have considered ‘Google’ a good name for a search engine in the late nineties or even at the dawn of the new millennium? Or Yahoo! for that matter?

Update: per request in the comments, here are some interesting articles on naming:

Seth Godin - the new rules of naming
Folksonomy - 7 tips for naming your Web 2.0 startup
GigaOm - 3 rules for naming your startup
LSVP blog - Naming your startup
Startup Spark - Everything You Need To Know About Naming a Startup
TechRepublic - The dos and don’ts of naming your start-up
GigaOM - A Two-part Rule for Naming Your Startup
Seth Godin - Sloppy naming
Fort Worth Startup blog - Naming your startup
Entrepreneur.com - Naming your business
Name Ideas - Naming Your Start-up: Simple Do’s and Don’ts
Guy Kawasaki - The Name Game

But still, here’s a list of 15 startups I personally think have some of the dumbest names in the Web 2.0 industry (note that I’m not judging their actual service), in no particular order:

1. Adaptive Blue

Develops personalization technologies that leverage semantics and attention.

My guess is they absolutely wanted to use the word ‘adaptive’ but were unable to get the right domain name, so they just picked any color and magically combined the words into something horrendously unmemorable.

2. Thoof

Personalized/social news recommender

Thoof. Pfoof. Floof. Any startup that gets named after a farting sound deserves to be on this list. Enough said. Note: Thoof was reportedly deadpooled, but the domain now points to Reddit. I wonder if this was a generous last configuration of the owner or an unreported acquisition?

3. Weebly

AJAX website creator

Weebly has some ring to it, but compare it to the names of their closest competitors (Synthasite, Webnode, KickApps, etc.) and it sounds more like a kid’s toy, or an adult website. I’m guessing ‘weeb’ is supposed to make you think of the term ‘web’, but I’m really not sure. According to UrbanDictionary, it can also refer to a monkey penis or someone who would do anything to get some attention.

4. Yoono

Social link and tag sharing network

Yoowhat? A typical example of a startup so desperate to have a two-syllable name that they’d have picked anything that sounded remotely pronounceable. Except of course you’re likely to forget the name or the spelling of it after a heartbeat.

5. Zlio

Gives users the ability to create their own shops and sell goods from other e-commerce services.

A ‘z’ isn’t meant to be followed by another consonant, and there’s a good reason for that. It’s not only hard to pronounce - I personally tied a knot in my tongue -, it’s also extremely forgettable.

6. Diigo

Social annotation service

Using ‘ii’ in your name is never a good idea. There’s absolutely no way you can talk about your startup without having to spell its name for people to actually find it on the web. When I search ‘digo’ (the most logical keyword to use when you hear the name), you won’t find it, but you will come across an internet phone service on the first page.

7. Heekya

Social storytelling platform

Whatever a ’social storytelling platform’ is, it doesn’t even matter if the name ‘Heekya’ doesn’t even refer to anything. I would love to see their employees pitch normal people about their service in plain English. And what’s with the dots above the e’s?

8. Insala

Web-based software for organizations implementing talent development, management, and retention initiatives.

Is this the name of a trendy salad bar? An islamic prayer? Or is it a synonym for Innovation, Customer Responsiveness and Focus, Employee Satisfaction, International Reach, Entrepreneurial Accomplishment and Rapid Growth? You guessed it, it’s supposed to be the last one.

9. Jiglu

Automatically creates intelligent tags for your web content.

While Jiglu on itself is already absolutely meaningless, painfully undescriptive and just not very catchy as a term, the entire product line is named after it: JigluTags, JigluHood, JigluMedia and JigluEnterprise. As if it was actually meant to create confusion about everything the startup produces.

10. Mzinga

Bbrings white-label social networks to consumer research.

Just like ‘z’ isn’t meant to be followed by a consonant, it’s better not to put it after a consonant, either. The word ‘Mzinga’ makes me think of an African warlord, or an exotic Hawaiian dance routine, but it certainly won’t make me go “Aha, that’s that white-label social networking site creator”. Gotta wonder how to came up with that one.

11. Oooooc.com

Provides a marketplace for contents and services.

Much like Zooomr and ooooj, it’s just too many o’s. How do they refer to their service? Worse, how do they point people to their website on the phone? “No it’s 5 o’s, c, dot c-o-m, sir … No no no, 5 times the letter ‘o’ … ah crap.” If you want to be the next-generation eBay, you might want to consider changing the name first, guys.

12. ooVoo

Attempts to add the human experience into communicating online with improved video and voice communication tools.

Same story as Yoono: it may sound pronounceable, but the fact that’s is so damn hard to remember the name and the spelling thereof doesn’t justify picking a two-syllable word. I mean, it sounds like an evil spell or a character from Star Wars.

13. SocialThing

Synchronizes your personal information, content, and friendships so that you can post this information across the social web.

It’s really hard coming up with a good name that starts with ’social’ anymore these days, but if you’re going to do it anyway, why pick something so blatantly generic as ‘thing’? It’s like they couldn’t figure out what their own product actually did, and they just talked about it as some ‘thing’ they were coding. Oh yeah, and the exclamation mark thing was very cool in the nineties.

14. Sclipo

Social learning network for teaching through video & webcam.

Say ’sclipo’ out loud. Enough said, right? It sounds like a name that’s been incubated by someone with a speaking disability. It reveals nothing about the product, which is fairly niche to begin with. Nada, zip, rien du tout. The only thing it makes me think of is the Roman politician Scipio.

15. CrazyEgg

Advanced analytics to track what your users are doing on your website.

This one, like Weebly, has some ring to it and with so many competitors it’s probably meant to stand out just a little. But CrazyEgg? Crazy. Egg. Sounds like they really wanted to have a logo with an egg in it and found out crazyegg.com wasn’t registered yet, so they just went for that name.

Did I miss any good, well, bad ones?

Let me know in comments what you think the dumbest name for a Web 2.0 startup is!

I hope you like that post!

The Next Web Blog covers start-up news from all over the world (not just the Valley), exciting new technologies and inspiring entrepreneurs. If you're new here, you may want to read our 'About' page and subscribe to our RSS feed.

Do you have a start-up that we should write about? Contact us! Thanks for visiting and hope you come back again!

corporate identity, domain names, naming, naming your startup, naming your Web 2.0 startup, startup naming, web 2.0

About the author: Robin Wauters is a Belgium-based social media consultant, startup advisor, blogger, entrepreneur, Twitter fanatic, conference organizer and allround web addict. Between trying out just about every new web application that gets in his sight, he advises local startups like ContactOffice, Oxynade and Yuntaa. And when he's not busy trying to keep tabs with what's going on in the virtualization & cloud computing industry as managing editor of Virtualization.com, he's probably working on the organization of Plugg, an annual celebration of European web entrepreneurship.

Post that could be related to this post:

Registry fee for domain names will increase

Yesterday, VeriSign announced that the prices for registering .com and .net domain names will increase. The Internet services company agreed with the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) that from October 1, the...

Thar’s gold in them domain names!

I guess we all know that selling domain names can be pretty good business. But exactly how much money is in that business is anybody's guess. To give you an impression of what your 4...

Gil Penchina: “Give your customers insane levels of control”

Gil Penchina, CEO of Wikia - the company hosting wikis -, was The Next Web second key-note speaker. He used to be the vice president and general manager at eBay and I'm sure that switching...

100 comments/trackbacks to “The 15 dumbest names for Web 2.0 startups”

Oct 14, 2008: Five in the Morning 101408 « StickyFigure
[...] The 15 Dumbest Names for Web Startups - and, some helpful links to good naming articles by bloggers. Nice collection by Robin Wauters. [...]
Oct 14, 2008: Vote for this article at blogengage.com
The 15 dumbest names for Web 2.0 startups…

Here’s a list of 15 startups I personally think have some of the dumbest names in the Web 2.0 industry (note that I’m not judging their actual service)…

By Boris Veldhuijzen van Zanten on Oct 13, 2008

Well, you missed Fleck, Wakoopa, twones and Yahoo. :-)

One thing I was wondering about: people hardly ‘talk’ about the webservices anymore these days. You chat, twitter and email. There used to be a time when spelling was important because we talked to each other face to face or on the phone all the time. These days your name just has to look good. I don’t mean the logo. I mean it has to look good in Twitter and even in comment forms like this where they use Courier as the input font.

[Reply]
By Robin Wauters on October 13th, 2008:
No, WE chat and Twitter. That doesn’t mean the mass audience does the same.

[Reply]
By Mike Abundo on October 14th, 2008:
There was a time when the masses didn’t search or email, either.

[Reply]
By Stijn Wijndaele on Oct 13, 2008

Imho this is definitely the dumbest one : Oooooc.com

[Reply]
By Ørv on Oct 13, 2008

This article made my day :D

Thanks!

[Reply]
By Philip Robertson on Oct 13, 2008

Nice fun article for a Monday Robin and you are absolutely correct. Creating names that create a lasting impression, capture the imagination or at the very least an impression of what something is/does is tricky. Allow me to provide a little colour to the decision to name our company ooVoo – you are certainly not the first person to question it and I dare say you won’t be the last.

When ooVoo was founded the company had the simple mantra of connecting people face to face online. We wanted to reflect this in the company’s name as a way of describing what we do. Two pairs of eyes represented by the letter “o” twice connected by “V” for video equates – it’s a visual representation of connecting two people face to face by video. As a brand we’ve grown, and ooVoo is being adopted quickly to the point that 5 million video conversations take place on a communication platform with an odd looking name. We honestly haven’t looked into how much the name has contributed to the success of the company as we’re really focused on creating the highest quality video chat service online.

Just in case you are having problems with the pronunciation here’s a quick tutorial video ;) - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tkhSZlAWt2M

Out of curiosity what’s the reasoning behind the names for “Yuntaa” or the “Plugg” conference that you represent? Can you provide a little guidance for entrepreneurs or point individuals to resources that might be helpful in naming conventions.

Best regards,

Philip

[Reply]
By Robin Wauters on October 13th, 2008:
Hi Philip, thanks for the quick and honest feedback.

Note that I’m only a consultant to Yuntaa, I’m not a partner with the company although I think the name is rather good and sticky.

The origin of ‘Plugg’ is explained on the website: http://plugg.eu/about-plugg (bottom)

I also updated the post with a couple of links to interesting articles about naming your startup.

[Reply]
By Peter Evers on Oct 13, 2008

Oooooc.com is defintely the dumbest one I’ve ever heard of. But as Boris mentioned Yahoo! is pretty dumb as well, but well, I guess it’s all good once you’re used to it.

[Reply]
By Rudy Lopes on Oct 13, 2008

These are some pretty wacky names. It reminds me of discussions we had after our first website rollout.

Our site was meant to be the next big thing in college student resources, so we thought it’d be cool to call it IamProximus.com. Unfortunately, since Latin is no longer a required subject, we quickly wised up and changed it to something more meaningful to college students, and after rechristening it as College-Cram.com we got much better results.

[Reply]
By Laurens on Oct 13, 2008

hilarious! wakoopa def should be in there!

[Reply]
By Adam Jackson on Oct 13, 2008

There were a bunch of vowels left over from all the other web 2.0 names so we got a really good deal on some letter o’s. “Yoono” was the best way for us to use them.

[Reply]
By Robin Wauters on October 13th, 2008:
Cute :)

[Reply]
By Philip Robertson on October 13th, 2008:
..Adam Jackson wins with a company that is also a triple point score on Scrabble used the right way.

Can I change my answer now… ? ;)

[Reply]
By David Petherick on Oct 13, 2008

I loved this article. Well done Robin.

The importance of names is also critical when considering that the English language, Chinese and Spanish are the three most commonly-used first languages online at present. If something is unclear, its lack of clarity across country and language barriers will only be magnified - not a good business strategy.

Disclosure: This link is for one of my companies: http://clarocada.com/clarocada.....or-profit/ - and we make the point that “…potential customers immediately have doubt in their minds as to your ability, and your professionalism. Online, you can’t afford that. Your competitors are a click away. Click. Gone.”

[Reply]
By John Doe on Oct 13, 2008

If you are so smart, how come you have 0 traffic?

http://www.alexa.com/data/deta.....extweb.org

[Reply]
By Robin Wauters on October 13th, 2008:
You’re right, we’re idiots and we don’t have any traffic. So why are you wasting your time coming here and commenting (anonymously at that)?

[Reply]
By Boris on October 13th, 2008:
Wow, there are 4,130,000 Google results for John Doe. Are you the real one?

[Reply]
By Drivingsouth on October 13th, 2008:
C’mon guys, dont spend your time replying to these comments just to increase your website by 5 page views :) lol

[Reply]
By Jan de Ridder on Oct 13, 2008

Not only the names…. it’s the similarity of logo’s… they all look alike somehow this often adds to the total stupidity of the name.

Some individuality would be welcome here

[Reply]
By k on Oct 13, 2008

I agree some names are a bit unusual but we need to look at the numbers too, no?
Icanhascheezburger … a site about cats and doing big numbers!

And what sticks is important as well. I can’t seem to forget the name Thoof.
I made a collage this weekend using the typical web 2.0 logos.
I used logos from companies who are experiencing the bursting bubble. Thoof’s on it, and if it wasn’t for the fact that it went poof, it might have been a good name because it’s the first one that comes to my mind.
Although I have to say I have no idea what it means. And maybe that’s not so good. I’m no expert in this.

[Reply]
By preetam mukherjee on Oct 13, 2008

Hahhaha! That was totally hilarious..and I’m wondering what you’d have to say about “marcellus”..????????

[Reply]
By Robin Wauters on October 13th, 2008:
Well it made me think of Pulp Fiction instantly, which is NEVER a bad thing to do :)

[Reply]
By preetam mukherjee on October 13th, 2008:
Ah! Spot on, spot on.

About 1 in every 50 actually get it. 20-odd wonder WTF we’re talking about, and the rest go right back to Greek/Roman mythology…to Claudius Marcellus.

I’m going to try and make sure you’re one of the first ones to hear about “mia” before we launch it in the Fall.

Until then…it’s back to a pack o’ Red Apples for me..;)

[Reply]
By Wayne B on Oct 13, 2008

You forgot StumbleUpon. That name grates on my ears like nails on a chalkboard.

[Reply]
By Robin Wauters on October 13th, 2008:
Absolutely love the name ‘StumbleUpon’. It’s very descriptive, remarkable, an actual phrase often used, hard to mispronounce,etc.

[Reply]
By Wayne B on October 13th, 2008:
That’s the exact reason that the name StumbleUpon annoys me; because it tries to subjugate the oft-used phrase “I stumbled upon …”.

If I’m going to a site called StumbleUpon in order to find news, I’m not really stumbling upon anything, am I? No. Furthermore, stumbling is not cool :)

Also, I forgot Digg. I hate this name because of it’s double meaning. I feel like a total tool if I want to vote some piece of news up to the front page and the story is about some pregnant high-schooler leaving her baby in a dumpster.

I don’t really “dig” it, but it’s an important piece of news so I have to press the “digg it” button. Ugg, that’s annoying.

[Reply]
By Kearns on October 15th, 2008:
Wait, stumble upon doesn’t just serve up random URLs? Honestly I’ve never visited it because that’s what the name implied to me…

[Reply]
By Maarten Schenk on Oct 13, 2008

I don’t agree on yoono: I instantly understood it as the phonetic representation of “You know”, which is basically what it is about, I guess: the links and tags that you know.

But then again, http://www.youknow.com/ is for sale, so who knows?

[Reply]
By Tom on October 19th, 2008:
That’s exactly what I thought.

[Reply]
By preetam mukherjee on Oct 13, 2008

This conversation is way much more fun-ner than the ones on TC these days.

I actually get a little stressed out on there these days…is it just me + caffeine + arrington turning out to be a bad combo, or are there others who’re kinda sorta in sync?

[Reply]
By heri on Oct 13, 2008

i agree with the list, except from crazyegg.com, imo it’s a kick-ass name with personality. no more stupid than Coca-Cola

[Reply]
By srini on October 13th, 2008:
totally,

crazyegg

i mean that is hilarious

hahahahhaahha crazyegg !!!!!

[Reply]
By Joe on Oct 13, 2008

There are definitely dumber names out there. From Seattle there’s Pluggd (now Delve) and the absolute dumbest name ever:
Thinglefin.

Just try saying “Thinglefin” without sounding like a lisping half-wit.

[Reply]
By Robin Wauters on October 13th, 2008:
Yeah, Thinglefin’s bad.

[Reply]
By anzhillary on Oct 13, 2008

Mahalo, hands down.

[Reply]
By randomjohn on Oct 13, 2008

Oh, the irony…

http://venturebeat.com/2008/10.....g-plugins/

(AdaptiveBlue brings in $4.5M for Browsing Plugins - from VentureBeat)
these two articles appeared back-to-back in my newsreader. I guess the horrible name isn’t hurting adaptiveblue too badly.

[Reply]
By Robin Wauters on October 13th, 2008:
Yeah, saw that too. As I wrote, not judging the services per se.

[Reply]
By matt on Oct 13, 2008

oooooc reminds me of http://www.rrrrthats5rs.com

[Reply]
By Josef Assad on Oct 13, 2008

Heekya might make more sense to you if I told you “hekaya” (rough transliteration) is Arabic for “story”.

[Reply]
By Pierre Far on October 15th, 2008:
Yep. Another good translation is “tale” as in two cities.

The exact pronunciation of Heekya is wrong as it should be something like Heekaya. The Arabic word has an explicit long vowel after the k.

[Reply]
By Charles on Oct 13, 2008

Intersting article from someone who has a name not phonetically spelled “correctly.” Maybe your names should be #16 on your list. LOL

[Reply]
By John Thomas on Oct 13, 2008

What about Pelago (and their vowel-less product Whrrl)?

[Reply]
By Bart on Oct 13, 2008

But what about Flickr and Orkut?
The worst names in Dutch speaking regions!

[Reply]
By Niels R. on October 14th, 2008:
I second that :)

PS: Model names of cars also have these problems. Try to pronounce Toyota MR-II (em-èr-deux sounds like merdeu) or translate Mitsubishi Pajero from Spanish to e.g. English :)

[Reply]
By Jill on Oct 13, 2008

What about http://socialtops.com, good service, bad web2 name

[Reply]
By TreeRex on Oct 13, 2008

Cuil — hands down.

[Reply]
By Rudy Lopes on October 13th, 2008:
Agreed, if you need to explain how to pronounce your domain name then it’s not a good choice.

[Reply]
By richard mckay on Oct 13, 2008

Think that oooooc.com is pretty hard to remember due to the o’s however i’m fond of the name weebly and the service they provide - maybe like people the names eventually take on a new meaning once you get to know them. We had a longlist then a shortlist then pretty much ran our finger down list with eyes closed and picked zungalow. Doesn’t mean anything in English though there is an Eastern European musician named zungalo.

[Reply]
By David A on Oct 13, 2008

Here’s our take on it: http://blog.heekya.com/2008/10.....s-for.html

So what exactly does Heekya mean ?

There’s a Swahili word, Hikaya, that means story. I searched the word “story” and its ilk, in many languages, both major and smaller — such as my native Yoruba — and settled on Swahili not just for the beautiful world it inspired, but for the essence of the language. Swahili, as I’m sure some of you know, and maybe many of you don’t, is not really a native African language. It is 35% arabic (Hikaya also means story in Arabic as well) and is a mixture of Bantu, and generally, the language’s origin is uncertain. We like that for a few reasons, but mostly because Swahili is of many people, not really belonging to any of those peoples.

Such is a story. Each person has a unique narrative to tell, and we’re creating a platform for any one to tell that story. That story, such as Swahili, may not really belong to you, but to belong to everybody –especially those who participated in the story who happened to be there.

One bright reader, Josef Assad , points out in the comments what we at Heekya already know:

Heekya might make more sense to you if I told you “hekaya” (rough transliteration) is Arabic for “story”

And what is a social storytelling platform? Why do we call Heekya the “Wikipedia for Stories? ”

We’ve called Heekya “Wikipedia for Stories” and “scrapbooking for all of your digital media” but it is much more than that.
Daehee Park, editor-in-chief of ISTbuilding.com and a Junior at Penn State described Heekya as such:
Think of it as a way to aggregate people’s life experiences through all forms of media, while weaving similar entries together with the Heekya algorithm to allow users to discover relevant stories. Why is this idea different? A typical blog is an embodiment of one’s ego which is haphazardly linked with others’ blogs through hyperlinks. Other life streaming tools such as Twitter and Flickr all focus around the individual, where you must follow a person of interest.
However, through geo-targeting, semantic processing and external embedding, Heekya is building the ideal channel of storytelling. And, along with it, comes a new social network that forms around a flourishing cloud of interweaving life experiences.
And of course, you may want to know why storytelling even matters ?

Storytelling is one of the few human traits that are truly universal across culture and through all of known history. [...] People in societies of all types weave narratives, from oral storytellers in hunter-gatherer tribes to the millions of writers churning out books, television shows and movies.

Whether fiction or nonfiction, a narrative engages its audience through psychological realism–recognizable emotions and believable interactions among characters.

As our ancestors evolved to live in groups, the hypothesis goes, they had to make sense of increasingly complex social relationships. Living in a community requires keeping tabs on who the group members are and what they are doing. What better way to spread such information than through storytelling?
We appreciate the mention, Robin, and we’re going to keep building the next generation storytelling platform here at Heekya .

That’s why we say at Heekya, ‘Your Story Lives Here.’

[Reply]
By Robin Wauters on October 13th, 2008:
Cool, thanks for taking the time to write a response!

[Reply]
By Avatar on Oct 13, 2008

yoono translates to “not me” in spanish
InSala = something in the living room (spanglish)

but i think FFFFound should be there.

[Reply]
By SocialMediaMojo on Oct 13, 2008

imeem.com - not so dumb when they started out as a social chat/file sharing (IM + meme) application, but when they dumped that and became youtube for music it seems the name didn’t help them. Most people out there see to have a blind spot for imeem and manage to forget that they have more users than any other social music site, at least they did until myspace music copied all their hard work. Hell, most tech bloggers were falling over themselves to praise muxtape for its innovation, even though the same mixtape feature had been promoted on imeem for years before Justin came up with a cooler name.

[Reply]
By Charlie on Oct 14, 2008

What about crush3r.com? Try remembering that one?

[Reply]
By Andrea Hill on Oct 14, 2008

Woopra.

[Reply]
By Sam Stevens on Oct 14, 2008

Um yeah, those are bad names! Seems there are plenty to go around. I couldn’t limit myself to just 15 when I wrote a similar post back in April: Seriously bad startup names

[Reply]
By Ryan Graves on Oct 14, 2008

Personally, I like adaptiveblue. The first time I heard it I thought of adapting to the infinite abyss. Which it helps you do. Adapt your browsing to the abyss that is the web. So, I think you’re off there.

The other ones that aren’t words in any language, I would have to agree!

[Reply]
By Some Nerd on Oct 14, 2008

Google … wtf is up with that shiznit?

[Reply]
By xavierv on Oct 14, 2008

Yea, you forgot Plugg, sounds like a plumber business or something

[Reply]
By Robin Wauters on October 14th, 2008:
I’m a bit biased, but I like the name Plugg :)

Hardest part was coming up with a name that sounds ok in French, Dutch, English, German, Spanish and Italian.

[Reply]
By Hiten Shah on Oct 14, 2008

I have two words for you, Crazy Egg.

[Reply]
By Mike Abundo on Oct 14, 2008

This silliness should end once the new TLDs kick in. In the meantime, we have no choice but to keep registering crazy domain names.

[Reply]
By Luca F. on Oct 14, 2008

to be honest I don’t give a damn about the name…

the service is what matters…

[Reply]
By max marvin on Oct 14, 2008

FWIX - a feed with a mix. give me a break

[Reply]
By Iain Fraser on Oct 14, 2008

Nice post. However, iinet do pretty well for themselves in Australia. I agree though that this is probably in spite of the name rather than because of it.

[Reply]
By joe on Oct 14, 2008

My nomination: splicd.com

SPLICKED? They “spliced” the word “spliced” in exactly the worst way.

[Reply]
By Xavier on Oct 14, 2008

Very interesting and inspired article Robin…
To be honest, I got scared twice while reading the TOP 15 !

1° My website : http://www.yooron.com (very close to something you made fun - see #4 and #12)
2 - My last name “Mazingue” very close to your #10 MZinga !

I guess, I have to live with it.

Take care & have fun

X

[Reply]
By James on Oct 14, 2008

How about Gnip… (pron. “guh-nip”)

[Reply]
By pgl on Oct 14, 2008

“There’s absolutely no way you can talk about your startup without having to spell its name for people to actually find it on the web”

As opposed to, say, Plugg? Heh.

[Reply]
By Robin Wauters on October 14th, 2008:
I guess I could have seen those coming :)

As I wrote in another comment to this article:

“I’m a bit biased, but I like the name Plugg :)

Hardest part was coming up with a name that sounds ok in French, Dutch, English, German, Spanish and Italian.”

[Reply]
By Stephen @ Jiglu on Oct 14, 2008

The hint in the beautiful Jiglu logo of a jigsaw man? The description about how we’re piecing the web together? The interplay between the first half of the word jigsaw and most of the word glue? Obviously way too subtle then in conveying what we do…

[Reply]
By Robin Wauters on October 14th, 2008:
Forgive me if I wrong, but do I sense a little tension there? :)

‘Tags that think’?
‘Piecing the web together’?

Yeah, crystal clear for sure. Your pay-off and website copy are even worse than the name Jiglu.

[Reply]
By Baxter Tocher on Oct 14, 2008

There’s something reassuring to me about Adaptive Blue. Their products seem high quality, and I’ve no problem with their name.

But some of the others…

[Reply]
By Alex (send SMS from your computer) on Oct 15, 2008

I have these guys on my mind today:

Zoho.com
Drupal.org
joomla.org

Why would one not care about SEO when it comes to picking a name?

[Reply]
By marysam on Oct 15, 2008

Another issue is how your startup sounds in other languages, what are people associations with the name.
F.e. a UK startup Zopa - sounds like ass in Russian.
Or russian startup http://www.picollator.com sounds like too much drinking alcohol in French ;)

[Reply]
By Patrick de Laive on Oct 15, 2008

Love the article

Always fun and difficult to pick a good name.

My 2 cents:
Edgeio (deadpooled)
YouBeQB
Sclipo
Sampa

[Reply]
By mort on Oct 15, 2008

CrazyEgg is a good name. Its memorable, fun to say, and easy to spell… certainly more so then any boring name that would be descriptive of analytic services.

why not have fun with a name? Its a good way to encourage word of mouth exposure.

[Reply]
By Jose Jones on Oct 16, 2008

What a bunch of warped cubicle-hamster, corporate gobbledy-gook.

[Reply]
By Josh on Oct 17, 2008

I think ooVoo happens to be a pretty good name, and it’s pretty easy to remember. Not any different than “Skype” in my opinion/

[Reply]
By Janis Lanka on Oct 17, 2008

This is great to see someone pick on “web 2.0″ names finally. I think the trend was great, but as always, there are few that take it to weird dimensions. Good post!

[Reply]
By Cam on Oct 17, 2008

“Using ‘ii’ in your name is never a good idea.”

Yeah, because we all know what a failure ‘Wii’ was…

[Reply]
By Marc de Ruijter on Oct 18, 2008

I’ve just re-invted the meaning of ‘lol’. Thanks for this funny analysis of the 2.0 namespace.

[Reply]
By Bill on Oct 18, 2008

our organization uses a company called “Hot Banana” for web content management…although they were acquired and are in the process of phasing the name out.

good company, bad name.

[Reply]
By L on Oct 18, 2008

You forgot to include ‘flippid.com’

[Reply]
By Dwayne Haskell on Oct 18, 2008

How about meebo, pidgin, or meez.
All strange and non-descriptive in my opinion.

[Reply]
By Patrick on Oct 18, 2008

euh, faut avouer que yuntaa et plugg sont guere geniaux…
the point that EN as a language is being supplanted by others, and that there are now language webs that operate on a separate level from a purely EN centric model. I particularly like the example of Heekya modeled on Swahili. Lots of ZH websites use numbers (51, for I want, 88 for happy or prosperous) that render the websites meaningless outside their context, but they have large user bases so do not require any EN centric ’sensible’ name. I think we will see more names using non european conventions since the Internet has viable non european populations (exceptions being Russian, Spanish and Portuguese that have worlwide/continental communities with active monolingual web 2 sites) as well as sizeable non EN speaking/reading users.
A second problem is the lack of coherent names available for use, (does joomla make much sense? or joost.com? (it is a good BE/NL name though)) which severaly hampers any new idea trying to find a name to use. this means that many startups have to spend ridiculous amounts of time finding and then justifying a name that they know is tenuous to start with, but did they have a choice?
it is worth digging a bit more (diggit, reddit, argh) to find out why those names were chosen. i am not sure that the names are always a sufficient reason for failure,

[Reply]
By Sosha Shadman on Oct 18, 2008

Mzinga is a swahili word that means cannon

[Reply]
By Moorke on Oct 18, 2008

Worse than a bad name is an average one. I like oovoo & cuil for that reason; they are food for conversation. Also, being read more often people tend to like names more (mere exposure effect). Meaning you return these start-ups a favour here :-).

[Reply]
By Anand on Oct 18, 2008

Absolutely loved the listings and more importantly the description..MZinga was the most hilarious and oooooc the dumbest…

But as like others have mentioned, AdaptiveBlue,CrazyEgg and Yoono were not dumb…There are worse names like Xumii, Zoho, etc..

[Reply]
By Eik on Oct 19, 2008

Hey, what about facebook?
I rest my case.

[Reply]
By we are Five-O-C on Oct 19, 2008

I believe that the fact you are talking of OOOOOC.com is the reason to choose a ‘not-avarage-name’.

Seth Godin, which I saw you recommend his articles, says in “Purple Cow” that you should “give people something to talk about”, which I believe we did..

So you should say ‘Five-O-See’ - sometimes when people buzz your website to one anoter they are happy to ‘teach’ one another how to pronounce.. that was the case in many.

But most important - thanks for talking about us.

and let the good app be the reason for choosing us.

OOOOOC.com

[Reply]
By moi on Oct 20, 2008

why isn’t thenextweb on the list over dumbest names?

[Reply]
By Boris Veldhuijzen van Zanten on October 20th, 2008:
Because we are saving that for “The 15 smartest names for Web 2.0 startups” which we will publish next week.

[Reply]
By moi on Oct 20, 2008

nice :-)

[Reply]
By MEtC on Oct 30, 2008

Then there’s wiggio which doesn’t fit at all with the tag line “makes it easy to work in groups.”

[Reply]
By Blog on Nov 6, 2008

not agreeable. what can u say about Google? It has double 0, ayt?

those that have the weirdest, dumbest names are those that succeed.

[Reply]
By Kitery on Nov 7, 2008

The reason for these names is extremely simple: The dearth of good domain names.

I have literally thought up words and I find these domains are also taken. And 99% of the time, these domains are not in use, other than parking/ransoming.

We need new ICANN rules on domain name usage/squatting/parking, plus much higher annual fees. That will help.

[Reply]
By johnson on Nov 8, 2008

Hoorray. utterly crappy spelling: http://www.hoorray.com

[Reply]
By daftie on Nov 17, 2008

ipipi.com

[Reply]

The Next Web