Has Pownce gone Napster?
Written on May 8, 2008 – 8:32 pm
David Petherick, Next Web WebTipr United Kingdom
If you came here from Digg it would be great if you could actually Digg us too! Do you have a start-up that we should write about? Contact us! Thanks for visiting and hope you come back again!
Pownce, the “Send stuff to your friends” application and web service, announced some new features late yesterday, and most of the world has woken up to these today.
The official blog announcement from Pownce is brief, and says little more than “Tonight we launched the new feature of sharing files to the public… In addition, we’re happy to announce that we’ve increased the base file size limit for all Powncers from 10MB to 100MB!”
So you can share files not just with your fans and friends, but with everyone - and you can upload 100Mb of files - room enough for a few videos and audio files, and Pro members have a tidy 250Mb of space. Nice. And I think Pownce have simplified the thrust of their offering by saying “we let you share stuff with your friends”.
But where does this place Pownce as a service? It certainly adds differentiation from Twitter, if you consider it to be a micro-blogging tool. It also has a mobile client that works well. And the geeks tell me the API to allow them to hook Pownce into their applications and web sites is really sweet. So all good news. But it could also mean that it’s about to become a new file-share dumping site — because you can now share anything with the world at large. And there, precisely, is where there is a little problem - potentially a big one.
When we look at the news today, we see that the defunct TorrentSpy’s parent company just got hit with a $110m legal judgement with bells on - and this comes long after the site was shut down. The Motion Picture Association of America is making sure its victims are well and truly dead by shooting them again, and suing them after they are dead. The MPAA has been awarded statutory damages of $30,000 “per infringement pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 504(c), for each of the 3,699 infringements shown, for a total judgment in the amount of $110,970,000…”. Ouch.
So, do you think that someone, somewhere, sometime, soon, is going to add something to Pownce that they do not have the right to add? Uhuh. And that some who has rights or an interest in that content might take action to have it removed and to stop such infringements being repeated? Uhuh, I do. Nobody’s really going to be interested in the terms and conditions of use of Pownce in that context, and I’m sure Pownce won’t have the resources to act as ‘file police’. But after all, to quote Pownce “You can send just about anything: music, photos, messages, links, events, and more. You can do it all on our web site, or install our lightweight desktop software that lets you get out of the browser.” Make that “share just about anything”, and the genie is out of the bottle.
In an ideal world, it’s a great addition to a fine service from some great people. But it’s not an ideal world, and I do suspect that this may be a little timebomb… tick tick tick tick tick tick tick.
Email
Twitter
Facebook
Netlog
Linkedin
The Next Web Blog is closely associated with The Next Web Conference which is held annually in Amsterdam, The Netherlands. At this event speakers from all over the world come together to talk about, and show of, the future of the Web. (
4 Responses to “Has Pownce gone Napster?”
By Joop on May 9, 2008 | Reply
Guess it doesn’t hurt to copy a web incentive that is successful, to discover your niche later!
The file sharing makes me want to try this again, thanks David!
By Steven on May 9, 2008 | Reply
Come on, everywhere you look, there are these files available for download FREE. Despite every legal case thus far! Downloading of the said content should be offered first and foremost by the labels who own them, who should wake up and exploit the Internet as this platform is the most elegant and cost effective distribution method period. If they embraced it fully, offering content for next to nothing, lets say 50 cents for a film download and 10 cents for a music track, they would be up on sales overall. They need to hire the best coders they can find and fire their accountants and lawyers as it is them who are bleeding them dry, not the people who are smart enough to see an opportunity and exploit it.
By David Petherick on May 9, 2008 | Reply
I am all for firing lawyers and accountants, Steven.
A big problem is that accountants and lawyers are always good at arguing they are ‘adding value’, even when they are clearly destroying it.
I think that the mainstream music and entertainment industry are largely reactionary dinosaurs when it comes to ‘the internet’. They just don’t get it - and to embrace it fully - well - there are too many vested interests to fight against - but the rewards will be crushing for the organisation or alliance that forms around this opportunity.
By Vitor Domingos on May 10, 2008 | Reply
I think that the mainstream music and entertainment industry are largely reactionary dinosaurs when it comes to ‘the internet’.
Not quite so… The music industry is composed by three heavy parts; the doers, the distributors and the sellers. The people who do music, composers, writers, singers, band, etc, will be doing music.. Now comes the two major disruptive problems for the industry, as we know it; there’s new ways of distributing music and selling it, rather than in discotheques or music stores. So, this _is_ the problem for the industry, they don’t want to give up on those two major dependencies - that’s a whole bunch of mouths to feed.
It’s not about reactionary dinosaurs, but rather that everyone is cutting on the middleman; distributors and sellers, and the industry doesn’t want that happening. The sooner they understand that the distribution is over internet and the sellers are now social applications/services, the better for them.